<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marriage As A Business Proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.happinessinthisworld.com/2009/05/03/marriage-as-a-business-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.happinessinthisworld.com/2009/05/03/marriage-as-a-business-proposal/</link>
	<description>Reflections of a Buddhist Physician</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tansy</title>
		<link>http://www.happinessinthisworld.com/2009/05/03/marriage-as-a-business-proposal/#comment-61682</link>
		<dc:creator>Tansy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happinessinthisworld.com/?p=443#comment-61682</guid>
		<description>Love your writing although I feel this comparison of marriage to a business partnership knocks the magic and soul out of the enterprise.  

Would also like to share that some of the comments here seem to be written by over intellectualized creepy old men. Stop blaming your wives for your sexual frustration and ask yourselves if you would want to sleep with a mind who has no heart.



&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tansy&lt;/strong&gt;:  My purpose here was to suggest an analogous lens through which to view marriage that I&#039;d hoped would provide insight otherwise hard to grasp.  I didn&#039;t intend for anyone to view marriage only as a business.

Alex&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your writing although I feel this comparison of marriage to a business partnership knocks the magic and soul out of the enterprise.  </p>
<p>Would also like to share that some of the comments here seem to be written by over intellectualized creepy old men. Stop blaming your wives for your sexual frustration and ask yourselves if you would want to sleep with a mind who has no heart.</p>
<blockquote><p><em><strong>Tansy</strong>:  My purpose here was to suggest an analogous lens through which to view marriage that I&#8217;d hoped would provide insight otherwise hard to grasp.  I didn&#8217;t intend for anyone to view marriage only as a business.</p>
<p>Alex</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marriage As A Business Proposal</title>
		<link>http://www.happinessinthisworld.com/2009/05/03/marriage-as-a-business-proposal/#comment-11530</link>
		<dc:creator>Marriage As A Business Proposal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happinessinthisworld.com/?p=443#comment-11530</guid>
		<description>[...] dimension of love—has nevertheless served my wife and I well: marriage as a business proposal.   Full Article Source    Posted in Very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dimension of love—has nevertheless served my wife and I well: marriage as a business proposal.   Full Article Source    Posted in Very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arne N. Gjorgov, MD, PhD</title>
		<link>http://www.happinessinthisworld.com/2009/05/03/marriage-as-a-business-proposal/#comment-6813</link>
		<dc:creator>Arne N. Gjorgov, MD, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happinessinthisworld.com/?p=443#comment-6813</guid>
		<description>Amazing! Biological side of the intimate, woman-man relations has not been even contemplated. ‘Sex’ was mentioned only once, as a passing reference, in one of the commentaries (alfaprima). No wonder that Margaret Mead, the anthropologist, asserted that the Western world, including Americans, is ignorant and primitive when it comes to sexual matters. This is perhaps the shortest explanation of the main if not sole reason for the perplexing and excess breast cancer epidemic in women of reproductive age, as well as of the rampant anorexia-bulimia disorders (conveniently, but wrongly called “eating” disorders) in schoolgirls and other young women (daughters). 

Long ago, in a hypothesis-testing study, initiated and carried out at two American universities, in the mid-1970s, the evidence was corroborated that the CONDOMIZATION of female sexuality was significantly associated with the development of breast cancer in American married women. The evidence of the significant condom-use and breast-cancer link was fully confirmed in a while by the (explicitly predicted) natural experiment of breast cancer upsurge and intensity of a rapid and unabated rise and spread of the current breast cancer epidemic, ever since the early 1980s.  

Inferences were drawn from the study results about both a potential of primary prevention of breast cancer as an epidemic disease(s), and a new, inclusive definition of the most enduring, basic human institution, the marriage. Besides the customary definition of marriage as a psychological, social, legal, economic (‘business’ in this case) unit, the marriage along with love, sexuality and family life was comprehended as a profound biological woman-man union, with physiologically powerful impact upon the spouses, particularly woman. The harm to marital relations and woman’s health, life and happiness was done by the misconceived, mass scale promotion of condom-use barriers which have deeply corrupted / upturned the intimate (sexual) ecosystem of the couple, by introducing technical effects of absolute male sterility in marriages, with effectively eliminating the putative protective seminal factors in the interhuman micro-environment.  No wonder that the women are those who in majority file for divorce nowadays, rather than the males.

The biological meaning of marriage, love and women’s needs and functions would perhaps be better understood along the way of the anticipated efforts for elimination (‘eradication’) of the current breast-ovarian cancer epidemics to a rare and low level of scattered cases at individual, familial and community stages.

Arne N. Gjorgov, M.D., Ph.D. (UNC-SPH, Chapel Hill, NC)
Author of “Barrier Contraception and Breast Cancer,” 1980: x+164</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing! Biological side of the intimate, woman-man relations has not been even contemplated. ‘Sex’ was mentioned only once, as a passing reference, in one of the commentaries (alfaprima). No wonder that Margaret Mead, the anthropologist, asserted that the Western world, including Americans, is ignorant and primitive when it comes to sexual matters. This is perhaps the shortest explanation of the main if not sole reason for the perplexing and excess breast cancer epidemic in women of reproductive age, as well as of the rampant anorexia-bulimia disorders (conveniently, but wrongly called “eating” disorders) in schoolgirls and other young women (daughters). </p>
<p>Long ago, in a hypothesis-testing study, initiated and carried out at two American universities, in the mid-1970s, the evidence was corroborated that the CONDOMIZATION of female sexuality was significantly associated with the development of breast cancer in American married women. The evidence of the significant condom-use and breast-cancer link was fully confirmed in a while by the (explicitly predicted) natural experiment of breast cancer upsurge and intensity of a rapid and unabated rise and spread of the current breast cancer epidemic, ever since the early 1980s.  </p>
<p>Inferences were drawn from the study results about both a potential of primary prevention of breast cancer as an epidemic disease(s), and a new, inclusive definition of the most enduring, basic human institution, the marriage. Besides the customary definition of marriage as a psychological, social, legal, economic (‘business’ in this case) unit, the marriage along with love, sexuality and family life was comprehended as a profound biological woman-man union, with physiologically powerful impact upon the spouses, particularly woman. The harm to marital relations and woman’s health, life and happiness was done by the misconceived, mass scale promotion of condom-use barriers which have deeply corrupted / upturned the intimate (sexual) ecosystem of the couple, by introducing technical effects of absolute male sterility in marriages, with effectively eliminating the putative protective seminal factors in the interhuman micro-environment.  No wonder that the women are those who in majority file for divorce nowadays, rather than the males.</p>
<p>The biological meaning of marriage, love and women’s needs and functions would perhaps be better understood along the way of the anticipated efforts for elimination (‘eradication’) of the current breast-ovarian cancer epidemics to a rare and low level of scattered cases at individual, familial and community stages.</p>
<p>Arne N. Gjorgov, M.D., Ph.D. (UNC-SPH, Chapel Hill, NC)<br />
Author of “Barrier Contraception and Breast Cancer,” 1980: x+164</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There are no solutions&#8230; there are only tradeoffs. &#171; Stardust</title>
		<link>http://www.happinessinthisworld.com/2009/05/03/marriage-as-a-business-proposal/#comment-6512</link>
		<dc:creator>There are no solutions&#8230; there are only tradeoffs. &#171; Stardust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happinessinthisworld.com/?p=443#comment-6512</guid>
		<description>[...] So is that a loyalty mechanism? On that same note, why haven’t I ever thought about marriages as mergers and acquisitions? Marriage does bring about revenue increase, cost costing, synergy, and future [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So is that a loyalty mechanism? On that same note, why haven’t I ever thought about marriages as mergers and acquisitions? Marriage does bring about revenue increase, cost costing, synergy, and future [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Day</title>
		<link>http://www.happinessinthisworld.com/2009/05/03/marriage-as-a-business-proposal/#comment-5240</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 15:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happinessinthisworld.com/?p=443#comment-5240</guid>
		<description>To Mr. The Facts,

Sorry to hear of your troubles.  After some period of time I hope you will be able to dust yourself off, revisit the first two sections of the article (structure and matching), and give it a go again.  Not all women are the right women, but neither are they all the wrong women.  But you have to be able to not hold one experience against others.  Good luck.  I&#039;m pulling for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Mr. The Facts,</p>
<p>Sorry to hear of your troubles.  After some period of time I hope you will be able to dust yourself off, revisit the first two sections of the article (structure and matching), and give it a go again.  Not all women are the right women, but neither are they all the wrong women.  But you have to be able to not hold one experience against others.  Good luck.  I&#8217;m pulling for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

